GraphQL API Choices: Express vs Fastify in 2025

GraphQL API Choices: Express vs Fastify in 2025

When building a GraphQL API in Node.js, developers today are spoiled for choice. For years, the undisputed king of the hill was the combination of Express.js and Apollo Server—a battle-tested, robust, and feature-rich stack. But a new contender has emerged, built on a foundation of pure speed: Fastify and its native GraphQL engine, Mercurius.

As of 2025, the question is no longer just “How do I build a GraphQL server?” but “Which philosophy and stack will best serve my project’s needs?” This article breaks down the two leading combinations to help you decide.

The Incumbent: Express & Apollo Server

This is the stack that brought GraphQL to the masses in the Node.js world. It combines the most popular Node.js web framework with the most popular GraphQL server implementation.

  • Express.js: The veteran web server. It’s unopinionated, incredibly flexible, and backed by a colossal ecosystem of middleware that can solve almost any problem you can imagine. Its mantra is simplicity and flexibility.
  • Apollo Server: A comprehensive GraphQL server that works with any Node.js framework but is most commonly paired with Express. It’s known for its rich feature set, including caching, security controls, and the powerful Apollo Federation for building a distributed graph.

The Philosophy: Robustness and Ecosystem

The Express/Apollo combination is built on a foundation of maturity and extensibility. You get a stable, well-understood core and the ability to pull in community-vetted packages for any functionality you need. The focus is less on raw performance and more on providing a comprehensive, feature-complete solution backed by a massive community and excellent commercial tooling (like Apollo Studio).

Strengths:

  • Massive Ecosystem: If you have a problem, there is almost certainly an Express middleware or an Apollo community plugin to solve it.
  • Enterprise-Ready Features: Apollo Federation is the industry standard for creating a supergraph from multiple microservices.
  • Maturity and Stability: Both libraries have been battle-tested in production at an immense scale for years.
  • Familiarity: A vast number of developers already know Express, making onboarding easier.

The Challenger: Fastify & Mercurius

This stack is built for one primary purpose: speed. It pairs a modern, high-performance web framework with a GraphQL library designed to be its perfect, performance-optimized companion.

  • Fastify: A web framework obsessed with performance. It uses a schema-based approach and highly optimized code paths to achieve some of the fastest benchmarks in the Node.js ecosystem, boasting significantly lower overhead than Express.
  • Mercurius: A GraphQL adapter written specifically for Fastify. It’s not a standalone server but a tightly integrated plugin that leverages Fastify’s architecture to provide a GraphQL API with minimal overhead.

The Philosophy: Performance and Integration

The Fastify/Mercurius combination prioritizes raw speed and a clean, encapsulated architecture. By building Mercurius as a native Fastify plugin, the developers ensured it could take advantage of Fastify’s hooks, lifecycle, and request/reply decorators. The result is a cohesive system where GraphQL is not an add-on, but a first-class citizen.

Strengths:

  • Exceptional Performance: This is the key differentiator. It can handle a significantly higher number of GraphQL requests per second than the Express/Apollo stack, with lower memory and CPU usage.
  • Low Overhead: Ideal for serverless environments like AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions where cold start times and resource consumption are critical.
  • Modern Architecture: Fastify’s plugin system encourages encapsulation and code reuse, leading to a more structured and maintainable codebase.
  • Built-in Gateway and Subscriptions: Mercurius offers a highly performant GraphQL gateway implementation and excellent support for subscriptions out of the box.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AspectExpress + Apollo ServerFastify + MercuriusWinner
Raw PerformanceGoodExceptionalFastify/Mercurius
Ecosystem & CommunityMassive & MatureGrowing, but smallerExpress/Apollo
Enterprise FeaturesExcellent (Apollo Federation)Good (Built-in Gateway)Express/Apollo
Developer ExperienceFamiliar, flexible, but can be verboseStructured, integrated, less boilerplateTie (Depends on preference)
Resource OverheadHigherVery LowFastify/Mercurius
Learning CurveLow for Express veteransSteeper for the Fastify plugin modelExpress/Apollo

Export to Sheets

When to Choose Which Stack

Choose Express + Apollo Server when:

  • You are building a distributed graph and need the power and tooling of Apollo Federation.
  • Your team is already deeply experienced with the Express ecosystem.
  • You need to integrate a specific piece of Express-only middleware.
  • Access to the largest possible pool of documentation, tutorials, and community support is a top priority.
  • Maximum stability and a proven track record are more important than achieving peak requests-per-second.

Choose Fastify + Mercurius when:

  • Performance is a critical requirement for your API.
  • You are building a new project from scratch and want a modern, lean, and fast foundation.
  • You are deploying in a serverless or containerized environment where low overhead and fast startup times are crucial.
  • You appreciate a structured, schema-first, and plugin-based architecture that encourages code organization.

Conclusion

The debate between Express/Apollo and Fastify/Mercurius is a perfect illustration of the healthy evolution of the Node.js ecosystem. There is no single “best” choice, only the right choice for your project’s specific priorities.

The Express/Apollo stack remains the reliable, feature-rich incumbent, perfect for enterprise-grade applications where the power of the Apollo ecosystem is paramount. Fastify/Mercurius, however, has firmly established itself as the performance king, offering a compelling, modern alternative for teams that prioritize speed and efficiency above all else. For any new GraphQL project in 2025, both of these powerful duos deserve serious consideration.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *